https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178655 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of a refund claim of `5.58 lakhs. It held that the insurance premium for group insurance covering employees and their families, and service tax on car parking rentals were eligible input services related to the export of services. Citing legal precedents, including decisions by the High Court of Karnataka and the Tribunal, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing settled issues in previous cases. The decision underscores the significance of legal precedents in determining input credit eligibility and ensuring fair treatment in tax refund matters. en-us Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:37:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178655 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the rejection of a refund claim of `5.58 lakhs. It held that the insurance premium for group insurance covering employees and their families, and service tax on car parking rentals were eligible input services related to the export of services. Citing legal precedents, including decisions by the High Court of Karnataka and the Tribunal, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing settled issues in previous cases. The decision underscores the significance of legal precedents in determining input credit eligibility and ensuring fair treatment in tax refund matters. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178655