<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 316 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail CENVAT credit on Furniture and Fittings as well as on &quot;outdoor catering services.&quot; The Tribunal found that the Furniture and Fittings were essential for the insurance business and that the appellant met the specific criteria for claiming credit on catering services. The impugned order was disposed of accordingly, providing clarity on the eligibility of CENVAT credit for the appellant in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 316 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail CENVAT credit on Furniture and Fittings as well as on &quot;outdoor catering services.&quot; The Tribunal found that the Furniture and Fittings were essential for the insurance business and that the appellant met the specific criteria for claiming credit on catering services. The impugned order was disposed of accordingly, providing clarity on the eligibility of CENVAT credit for the appellant in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>