<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 96 -  CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside unjustified demands and reducing penalties where warranted. It emphasized aligning demands with show cause notices, clarified the inapplicability of Section 125 of the Customs Act in certain contexts, and stressed the importance of justified and proportionate penalty impositions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 96 -  CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by setting aside unjustified demands and reducing penalties where warranted. It emphasized aligning demands with show cause notices, clarified the inapplicability of Section 125 of the Customs Act in certain contexts, and stressed the importance of justified and proportionate penalty impositions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>