https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178646 The court dismissed the petitions challenging the withdrawal of fiscal incentives under the new industrial policy in the Northeastern Region. It held that the notifications withdrawing the exemptions were valid, citing the Finance Act, 2003, and subsequent notifications. The court found that the petitioner was not entitled to protection under Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, and the doctrines of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation did not apply. Additionally, the court determined that there was no delay or suppression of material facts that would prejudice the respondents. en-us Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Apr 2017 19:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178646 The court dismissed the petitions challenging the withdrawal of fiscal incentives under the new industrial policy in the Northeastern Region. It held that the notifications withdrawing the exemptions were valid, citing the Finance Act, 2003, and subsequent notifications. The court found that the petitioner was not entitled to protection under Section 38A of the Central Excise Act, and the doctrines of promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation did not apply. Additionally, the court determined that there was no delay or suppression of material facts that would prejudice the respondents. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178646