https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178647 Rule 4(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Stamp (Valuation of Property) Rules, 1997 was challenged as involving excessive delegation and arbitrariness in the fixation of circle rates for stamp duty purposes. The HC treated the challenge as raising a serious issue requiring examination and directed notice to the Advocate General, Uttar Pradesh, with counter affidavits and supporting material to be filed. No final adjudication was made on the validity of the rule or the impugned circle-rate notifications. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:49:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178647 Rule 4(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Stamp (Valuation of Property) Rules, 1997 was challenged as involving excessive delegation and arbitrariness in the fixation of circle rates for stamp duty purposes. The HC treated the challenge as raising a serious issue requiring examination and directed notice to the Advocate General, Uttar Pradesh, with counter affidavits and supporting material to be filed. No final adjudication was made on the validity of the rule or the impugned circle-rate notifications. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178647