<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 229 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the AO was not justified in substituting the sale consideration with the DVO&#039;s valuation as the difference was less than 10%. Valuation being an estimation, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to consider the sale consideration of Rs. 19 lakhs as disclosed by the assessee. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 229 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the AO was not justified in substituting the sale consideration with the DVO&#039;s valuation as the difference was less than 10%. Valuation being an estimation, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the AO to consider the sale consideration of Rs. 19 lakhs as disclosed by the assessee. The appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>