<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 310 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178639</link>
    <description>A person allotted and sub-leased a flat through a co-operative housing society was treated as the owner and landlord for eviction under Section 13(1)(ff) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, because the relevant inquiry is whether the claimant has a superior right to the premises as against the tenant. The Court noted that the allotment conferred a heritable and transferable possessory interest, and the allotment certificate was conclusive evidence of that title or interest. Absolute ownership was not required; a legally recognised superior interest sufficient against the tenant was enough to maintain the eviction action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:11:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 310 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178639</link>
      <description>A person allotted and sub-leased a flat through a co-operative housing society was treated as the owner and landlord for eviction under Section 13(1)(ff) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, because the relevant inquiry is whether the claimant has a superior right to the premises as against the tenant. The Court noted that the allotment conferred a heritable and transferable possessory interest, and the allotment certificate was conclusive evidence of that title or interest. Absolute ownership was not required; a legally recognised superior interest sufficient against the tenant was enough to maintain the eviction action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>