<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1042 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178636</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Appellate Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to decide the appeal concerning short-landing under Section 129A(b) of the Customs Act. The Court affirmed that the Tribunal correctly applied the statutory provision excluding such appeals from its jurisdiction. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal without costs, finding no error in declining to entertain the appeal based on jurisdictional limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:06:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1042 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178636</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the Appellate Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to decide the appeal concerning short-landing under Section 129A(b) of the Customs Act. The Court affirmed that the Tribunal correctly applied the statutory provision excluding such appeals from its jurisdiction. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal without costs, finding no error in declining to entertain the appeal based on jurisdictional limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>