https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271606 The High Court declined to entertain the petition concerning Krishna Clearing due to the availability of an alternative statutory remedy, directing them to approach the Tribunal. For the other petitioners, the Court found no serious dispute in facts. Since the Department had not appealed against the dropping of proceedings against them, the Commissioner (Appeals) had no authority to disturb the order. The Court quashed the order against petitioners No. 2 to 5, emphasizing the lack of hearing and the appellate Commissioner's decision against non-respondent parties. en-us Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Oct 2016 15:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271606 The High Court declined to entertain the petition concerning Krishna Clearing due to the availability of an alternative statutory remedy, directing them to approach the Tribunal. For the other petitioners, the Court found no serious dispute in facts. Since the Department had not appealed against the dropping of proceedings against them, the Commissioner (Appeals) had no authority to disturb the order. The Court quashed the order against petitioners No. 2 to 5, emphasizing the lack of hearing and the appellate Commissioner's decision against non-respondent parties. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271606