<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 296 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, setting aside the demand of Rs. 46,77,109. The Tribunal held that the assessee should not be treated as in default for failing to collect TCS as the buyers had filed their returns and paid taxes, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 296 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, setting aside the demand of Rs. 46,77,109. The Tribunal held that the assessee should not be treated as in default for failing to collect TCS as the buyers had filed their returns and paid taxes, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents supporting the assessee&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>