https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178618 The statutory right of appeal under the Defence of India Act was confined by the Rules, and the appellate bar in the second proviso to Rule 19 depended on the amount of compensation actually awarded, not the amount claimed. A complete rejection of the compensation claim was treated as an award not exceeding the prescribed limit, so the appeal fell within the statutory bar. No appeal lay to the High Court against the Arbitrator's order rejecting the claim entirely, and the appellate jurisdiction was not maintainable. en-us Tue, 17 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:05:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178618 The statutory right of appeal under the Defence of India Act was confined by the Rules, and the appellate bar in the second proviso to Rule 19 depended on the amount of compensation actually awarded, not the amount claimed. A complete rejection of the compensation claim was treated as an award not exceeding the prescribed limit, so the appeal fell within the statutory bar. No appeal lay to the High Court against the Arbitrator's order rejecting the claim entirely, and the appellate jurisdiction was not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178618