https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178615 The Tribunal upheld the AO's jurisdiction to reassess income, disallowing additional depreciation on plant and machinery, rejecting books of account, estimating profits, and disallowing employees' provident fund contributions. The Tribunal also upheld the disallowance of prior period expenses, recalculated the deduction under section 80HHB, and ruled no interest was leviable under section 234D. The deletion of additions made by the AO was upheld by the CIT(A). en-us Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178615 The Tribunal upheld the AO's jurisdiction to reassess income, disallowing additional depreciation on plant and machinery, rejecting books of account, estimating profits, and disallowing employees' provident fund contributions. The Tribunal also upheld the disallowance of prior period expenses, recalculated the deduction under section 80HHB, and ruled no interest was leviable under section 234D. The deletion of additions made by the AO was upheld by the CIT(A). Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178615