<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1041 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178613</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Transfer Pricing (T.P.) adjustment on account of royalty payment was not justified. The arms length price of the royalty was deemed necessary for the assessee&#039;s business, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted. The appeal was allowed, and the royalty payment was directed to be allowed as claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2017 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1041 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178613</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Transfer Pricing (T.P.) adjustment on account of royalty payment was not justified. The arms length price of the royalty was deemed necessary for the assessee&#039;s business, and the addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted. The appeal was allowed, and the royalty payment was directed to be allowed as claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>