https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178608 The statutory authority in Greater Bombay lacked jurisdiction to control the administration of a trust whose office of administration was in Gujarat, even though some trust property was situated in Maharashtra. The governing scheme and regional reorganisation order confined Bombay's authority to the property deemed registered in Maharashtra, and territorial nexus principles prevented it from assuming control over the trust as a whole. Filing documents before the Bombay office did not cure the jurisdictional defect. Directions affecting the entire trust were therefore unsustainable, and authority could be exercised only in relation to the Maharashtra property. en-us Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:24:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178608 The statutory authority in Greater Bombay lacked jurisdiction to control the administration of a trust whose office of administration was in Gujarat, even though some trust property was situated in Maharashtra. The governing scheme and regional reorganisation order confined Bombay's authority to the property deemed registered in Maharashtra, and territorial nexus principles prevented it from assuming control over the trust as a whole. Filing documents before the Bombay office did not cure the jurisdictional defect. Directions affecting the entire trust were therefore unsustainable, and authority could be exercised only in relation to the Maharashtra property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178608