https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178605 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and decree, and reinstated the trial court's decision. The High Court's presumption of undue influence based on relationship and circumstances was found to be incorrect as there was insufficient evidence of incapacity or dominance. The plaintiff failed to establish a case of undue influence with conflicting pleadings. The burden of proof in cases of alleged undue influence lies with the accuser, and the High Court's approach was deemed flawed. Costs were awarded against the respondents. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:11:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178605 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and decree, and reinstated the trial court's decision. The High Court's presumption of undue influence based on relationship and circumstances was found to be incorrect as there was insufficient evidence of incapacity or dominance. The plaintiff failed to establish a case of undue influence with conflicting pleadings. The burden of proof in cases of alleged undue influence lies with the accuser, and the High Court's approach was deemed flawed. Costs were awarded against the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178605