https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178601 A person in occupation as a licensee on 1 February 1973 acquires deemed tenancy under Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act only if the licence was valid and subsisting on that date. The SC upheld the factual finding, based on correspondence and earlier proceedings, that the occupants remained under a subsisting licence, and held that Article 227 interference was unwarranted absent perversity. It further held that jurisdiction in an eviction proceeding is judged from the averments in the claim application; the Small Causes Court's order was not a nullity, but it could not be enforced against the portion protected by the subsisting licence and deemed tenancy. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:36:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178601 A person in occupation as a licensee on 1 February 1973 acquires deemed tenancy under Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act only if the licence was valid and subsisting on that date. The SC upheld the factual finding, based on correspondence and earlier proceedings, that the occupants remained under a subsisting licence, and held that Article 227 interference was unwarranted absent perversity. It further held that jurisdiction in an eviction proceeding is judged from the averments in the claim application; the Small Causes Court's order was not a nullity, but it could not be enforced against the portion protected by the subsisting licence and deemed tenancy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178601