<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 747 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178597</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, a manufacturer of cycle parts, regarding the deduction of penalty paid to the Electricity Board for violating power regulations for the assessment year 1999-2000. The Court emphasized the importance of considering each case individually and applying the test of commercial expediency to determine the deductibility of such payments, aligning with established legal precedents and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal as no substantial question of law was found to arise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 12:15:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 747 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178597</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, a manufacturer of cycle parts, regarding the deduction of penalty paid to the Electricity Board for violating power regulations for the assessment year 1999-2000. The Court emphasized the importance of considering each case individually and applying the test of commercial expediency to determine the deductibility of such payments, aligning with established legal precedents and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal as no substantial question of law was found to arise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>