https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178584 The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI ruled that the CIT(A) had jurisdiction to decide on orders related to sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In the case concerning failure to deduct tax at source from interest payments to New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA), it was held that the assessee bank was not in default. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and allowed those filed by the assessee, determining that the CIT(A) with jurisdiction over the assesses correctly passed the orders. The judgment was delivered on 07.08.2015. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:28:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178584 The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI ruled that the CIT(A) had jurisdiction to decide on orders related to sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In the case concerning failure to deduct tax at source from interest payments to New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA), it was held that the assessee bank was not in default. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals and allowed those filed by the assessee, determining that the CIT(A) with jurisdiction over the assesses correctly passed the orders. The judgment was delivered on 07.08.2015. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178584