<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1023 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178585</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the addition of Rs. 50,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The court found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s explanation of an alleged gift, including lack of donor details, contradictory payment statements, and business ties between the donor&#039;s company and the appellant&#039;s husband. Comparisons with precedents from Delhi and Rajasthan High Courts were dismissed, as the appellant failed to prove the genuineness of the gift. The court concluded no substantial legal question arose, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:28:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1023 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178585</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the lower authorities&#039; decisions, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the addition of Rs. 50,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The court found discrepancies in the appellant&#039;s explanation of an alleged gift, including lack of donor details, contradictory payment statements, and business ties between the donor&#039;s company and the appellant&#039;s husband. Comparisons with precedents from Delhi and Rajasthan High Courts were dismissed, as the appellant failed to prove the genuineness of the gift. The court concluded no substantial legal question arose, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>