<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 276 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271571</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for AY 2007-08. The Court found that the issues raised regarding violations of section 80 IB(10) and project completion method were not substantial, as they had been previously addressed. The contention regarding excess area allotment was deemed academic as it did not affect the tax payable. Therefore, the Appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:24:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 276 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271571</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for AY 2007-08. The Court found that the issues raised regarding violations of section 80 IB(10) and project completion method were not substantial, as they had been previously addressed. The contention regarding excess area allotment was deemed academic as it did not affect the tax payable. Therefore, the Appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>