<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 268 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It directed fresh examinations by the AO on the issues of Repairs &amp;amp; Maintenance expenses, due diligence fee, and disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the non-applicability of Section 2(22)(e) on inter-corporate deposits from a subsidiary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:23:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 268 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal. It directed fresh examinations by the AO on the issues of Repairs &amp;amp; Maintenance expenses, due diligence fee, and disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the non-applicability of Section 2(22)(e) on inter-corporate deposits from a subsidiary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>