<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 264 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271559</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of interest charged under section 234B, citing the retrospective nature of the law amendment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the disallowance of deductions under sections 80HHC and 14A, as well as the treatment of derivative loss and application of Rule 8D, as the Revenue did not challenge these aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:23:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 264 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271559</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of interest charged under section 234B, citing the retrospective nature of the law amendment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the disallowance of deductions under sections 80HHC and 14A, as well as the treatment of derivative loss and application of Rule 8D, as the Revenue did not challenge these aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>