<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 259 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders rejecting refunds under notification no. 41/2007-ST for services like THC, business support, and BL charges due to improper invoices and lack of proof of service tax payment. Emphasizing the onus on the exporter to prove tax payment, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, citing precedents and legal interpretations that services related to port operations are exempt from service tax. The decision underscores the significance of accurate documentation and legal interpretations in refund claims under service tax notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 259 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders rejecting refunds under notification no. 41/2007-ST for services like THC, business support, and BL charges due to improper invoices and lack of proof of service tax payment. Emphasizing the onus on the exporter to prove tax payment, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, citing precedents and legal interpretations that services related to port operations are exempt from service tax. The decision underscores the significance of accurate documentation and legal interpretations in refund claims under service tax notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>