<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 255 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271550</link>
    <description>The petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to respond to the show-cause notice, participate in adjudication proceedings, and the delay in filing the appeal beyond the condonable period. The Court emphasized the importance of timely legal action and the need to avoid undue delays in seeking redressal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 255 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271550</link>
      <description>The petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to respond to the show-cause notice, participate in adjudication proceedings, and the delay in filing the appeal beyond the condonable period. The Court emphasized the importance of timely legal action and the need to avoid undue delays in seeking redressal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>