<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 254 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271549</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to avail cenvat credit against the endorsed bill of entry as a valid document under Rule 9(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Relying on precedent and arguments presented, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, allowing the appeals in favor of the appellant. The judgment was delivered on 22.12.2015 by the Tribunal member.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:21:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 254 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271549</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is entitled to avail cenvat credit against the endorsed bill of entry as a valid document under Rule 9(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Relying on precedent and arguments presented, the Tribunal set aside the previous order, allowing the appeals in favor of the appellant. The judgment was delivered on 22.12.2015 by the Tribunal member.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>