<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271546</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty liability, interest, and penalty imposed on the Director for his involvement in the clandestine removal of goods. The penalty was upheld despite the payment of duty liability and interest before the show-cause notice. The duty liability was recalculated based on the cum-duty value, which had already been paid by the Appellant. The penalty imposed under Section 11AC was equated to the re-quantified duty amount. The appeals were rejected, with the only modification being the reworking of the duty demand based on the cum-duty value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2016 10:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 251 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271546</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty liability, interest, and penalty imposed on the Director for his involvement in the clandestine removal of goods. The penalty was upheld despite the payment of duty liability and interest before the show-cause notice. The duty liability was recalculated based on the cum-duty value, which had already been paid by the Appellant. The penalty imposed under Section 11AC was equated to the re-quantified duty amount. The appeals were rejected, with the only modification being the reworking of the duty demand based on the cum-duty value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>