<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 247 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271542</link>
    <description>The court held that the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) cannot modify benefits granted under a Customs Act notification through circulars. Circulars imposing additional conditions not present in the original notification were deemed invalid. Refund applications rejected based on such circulars were set aside, directing the Department to grant refunds within four weeks. The court emphasized that statutory notifications, not administrative circulars, govern exemptions. The Petitioner was entitled to the refund of Special Additional Duty paid using Duty Entitlement Passbook (DEPB) scrips. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 247 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271542</link>
      <description>The court held that the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) cannot modify benefits granted under a Customs Act notification through circulars. Circulars imposing additional conditions not present in the original notification were deemed invalid. Refund applications rejected based on such circulars were set aside, directing the Department to grant refunds within four weeks. The court emphasized that statutory notifications, not administrative circulars, govern exemptions. The Petitioner was entitled to the refund of Special Additional Duty paid using Duty Entitlement Passbook (DEPB) scrips. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>