<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1040 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178567</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for a discrepancy in stock valuation between the bank statement and books of accounts was deleted. The tribunal found that a similar issue had been decided in favor of the assessee in a previous year, leading to the deletion of the penalty for the current year based on the High Court judgment. The appellant&#039;s argument of no intention to conceal income and accurate maintenance of stock records supported the decision to remove the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:27:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1040 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178567</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for a discrepancy in stock valuation between the bank statement and books of accounts was deleted. The tribunal found that a similar issue had been decided in favor of the assessee in a previous year, leading to the deletion of the penalty for the current year based on the High Court judgment. The appellant&#039;s argument of no intention to conceal income and accurate maintenance of stock records supported the decision to remove the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>