<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1382 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178565</link>
    <description>A beneficial exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. applies where goods are supplied for projects approved by the Government of India and financed by the World Bank or Asian Development Bank, even if the project implementation certificate is issued in the contractor&#039;s name rather than the supplier&#039;s. The decisive factor is the actual supply and use of the goods in the eligible project; where that factual use is undisputed and there is no material showing diversion outside the project, the absence of the supplier&#039;s name is not fatal. The exemption was therefore treated as available on the object of the notification, not a restrictive reading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1382 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178565</link>
      <description>A beneficial exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. applies where goods are supplied for projects approved by the Government of India and financed by the World Bank or Asian Development Bank, even if the project implementation certificate is issued in the contractor&#039;s name rather than the supplier&#039;s. The decisive factor is the actual supply and use of the goods in the eligible project; where that factual use is undisputed and there is no material showing diversion outside the project, the absence of the supplier&#039;s name is not fatal. The exemption was therefore treated as available on the object of the notification, not a restrictive reading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>