<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 941 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178551</link>
    <description>The ITAT confirmed the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, following precedents where penalties were deleted for similar additions to book profits. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The penalty was deleted based on Explanation 1 Clause (B) to Section 271(1), and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 19:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 941 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178551</link>
      <description>The ITAT confirmed the deletion of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, following precedents where penalties were deleted for similar additions to book profits. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A)&#039;s order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The penalty was deleted based on Explanation 1 Clause (B) to Section 271(1), and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>