<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 772 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178544</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee-company, a State Government concern engaged in construction activities, in a case concerning the entitlement to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1980-81. Citing a precedent from the Apex Court, the High Court held that the assessee did not qualify as an industrial undertaking eligible for the investment allowance. Consequently, the claim for investment allowance was disallowed, and the decision favored the revenue. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 772 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178544</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the assessee-company, a State Government concern engaged in construction activities, in a case concerning the entitlement to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1980-81. Citing a precedent from the Apex Court, the High Court held that the assessee did not qualify as an industrial undertaking eligible for the investment allowance. Consequently, the claim for investment allowance was disallowed, and the decision favored the revenue. No costs were awarded in this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>