https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178540 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the interest demand on the differential duty paid. The Tribunal found the demand for interest was time-barred under Section 11A, and the excess duty payment on inter-lining fabrics was adjusted against the interest demand. The judgment focused on interpreting the exemption notification, addressing the interest demand issue, applying the limitation period for interest demand, and resolving the adjustment of excess duty payment, providing a thorough analysis of the legal matters at hand. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Dec 2017 12:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178540 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the interest demand on the differential duty paid. The Tribunal found the demand for interest was time-barred under Section 11A, and the excess duty payment on inter-lining fabrics was adjusted against the interest demand. The judgment focused on interpreting the exemption notification, addressing the interest demand issue, applying the limitation period for interest demand, and resolving the adjustment of excess duty payment, providing a thorough analysis of the legal matters at hand. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178540