<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (4) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178525</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and upholding the lawful dismissal of the appellant after a proper enquiry. The court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the legality of charge-sheets, the opportunity to defend, the mode of enquiry, private enquiries by the Enquiry Officer, the vagueness of the show-cause notice, the Commissioner&#039;s findings, and the oppressiveness of multiple charge-sheets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (4) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178525</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and upholding the lawful dismissal of the appellant after a proper enquiry. The court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the legality of charge-sheets, the opportunity to defend, the mode of enquiry, private enquiries by the Enquiry Officer, the vagueness of the show-cause notice, the Commissioner&#039;s findings, and the oppressiveness of multiple charge-sheets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>