<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1610 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178524</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled that the refund of cost recovery charges paid by the appellant post 1-9-2001 falls under the administrative jurisdiction of the Department and is not subject to appeals before appellate authorities. The Tribunal emphasized that such refunds are an administrative function and advised the appellant to seek recourse through the jurisdictional Executive Commissioner or the department&#039;s administrative machinery. Despite acknowledging the delay in refunding the charges, the Tribunal urged the department to expedite the process. Both appeals were resolved based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:26:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1610 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178524</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled that the refund of cost recovery charges paid by the appellant post 1-9-2001 falls under the administrative jurisdiction of the Department and is not subject to appeals before appellate authorities. The Tribunal emphasized that such refunds are an administrative function and advised the appellant to seek recourse through the jurisdictional Executive Commissioner or the department&#039;s administrative machinery. Despite acknowledging the delay in refunding the charges, the Tribunal urged the department to expedite the process. Both appeals were resolved based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>