<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (8) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178517</link>
    <description>For valuation of agricultural produce under section 7 of the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act read with rule 4(2)(a) of the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Rules, 1944, the controlling factor is the value of the receipt to the assessee in the accounting year of receipt. If the produce was not sold in that year, market value must be determined by the average local price prevailing during that year. A later seizure and compulsory sale at a regulated procurement rate in the next year does not affect the earlier year&#039;s valuation, and subsequent price movements are immaterial. The produce was therefore to be valued at the open market price in the accounting year, not the later procurement rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:47:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (8) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178517</link>
      <description>For valuation of agricultural produce under section 7 of the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act read with rule 4(2)(a) of the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Rules, 1944, the controlling factor is the value of the receipt to the assessee in the accounting year of receipt. If the produce was not sold in that year, market value must be determined by the average local price prevailing during that year. A later seizure and compulsory sale at a regulated procurement rate in the next year does not affect the earlier year&#039;s valuation, and subsequent price movements are immaterial. The produce was therefore to be valued at the open market price in the accounting year, not the later procurement rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>