https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178514 Failure to comply with the pre-deposit direction resulted in dismissal of the appeal. The appellant did not appear despite notice and produced no evidence of having deposited the amount directed within the stipulated time. The Bench noted that the stay order remained uncomplied with and that the request for extension had already expired. On that factual basis, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:21:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178514 Failure to comply with the pre-deposit direction resulted in dismissal of the appeal. The appellant did not appear despite notice and produced no evidence of having deposited the amount directed within the stipulated time. The Bench noted that the stay order remained uncomplied with and that the request for extension had already expired. On that factual basis, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178514