<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 203 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271498</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the detention order due to an unexplained delay of three months and four days, finding it to have vitiated the order. The Court ordered the immediate release of the detenu, making the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Other grounds challenging the detention order were not considered by the Court in light of its decision on the delay issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 10:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 203 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271498</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the detention order due to an unexplained delay of three months and four days, finding it to have vitiated the order. The Court ordered the immediate release of the detenu, making the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Other grounds challenging the detention order were not considered by the Court in light of its decision on the delay issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>