https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271497 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, ruling against the appellant-assessee in a case concerning the levy of duty on finished goods under a compound levy scheme. The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to prove that the stock of goods was manufactured before 1.9.1997, leading to the conclusion that duty should be charged at the standard rate of 16% ad valorem rather than the specific rate under Notification No.50/97. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the appeal, affirming the recovery of the demand as per the show cause notice. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271497 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, ruling against the appellant-assessee in a case concerning the levy of duty on finished goods under a compound levy scheme. The Tribunal found that the appellant failed to prove that the stock of goods was manufactured before 1.9.1997, leading to the conclusion that duty should be charged at the standard rate of 16% ad valorem rather than the specific rate under Notification No.50/97. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the appeal, affirming the recovery of the demand as per the show cause notice. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271497