https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271494 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, in a case involving supplies to an SEZ company. The appellant's argument, supported by case law, led to the setting aside of the order-in-appeal demanding payment under Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal held that supplies to SEZ units should be treated as exports, exempting them from the Cenvat Credit Rules. The judgment provided clarity on the treatment of supplies to SEZ entities, favoring the appellant and granting any consequential relief. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 07 Feb 2016 17:49:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271494 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, in a case involving supplies to an SEZ company. The appellant's argument, supported by case law, led to the setting aside of the order-in-appeal demanding payment under Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal held that supplies to SEZ units should be treated as exports, exempting them from the Cenvat Credit Rules. The judgment provided clarity on the treatment of supplies to SEZ entities, favoring the appellant and granting any consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271494