<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 776 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178501</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the IT Act. It remitted the completion certificate issue to the AO for verification of construction completion before 31.3.2008. The Tribunal affirmed that profits from partially completed projects could be claimed annually under the percentage completion method. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 776 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178501</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the IT Act. It remitted the completion certificate issue to the AO for verification of construction completion before 31.3.2008. The Tribunal affirmed that profits from partially completed projects could be claimed annually under the percentage completion method. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>