<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 120 -  CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2190</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on lubricating oil notified under Rule 57Q from 1 March 1997 remained available under Rule 57A in light of the Board&#039;s subsequent clarification that credit was not intended to be denied for such goods. The six-month interval between the duty-paying documents and availment of credit did not justify disallowance where the clarification resolved the applicable treatment of lubricating oil. The credit was consequently available for utilisation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 120 -  CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2190</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on lubricating oil notified under Rule 57Q from 1 March 1997 remained available under Rule 57A in light of the Board&#039;s subsequent clarification that credit was not intended to be denied for such goods. The six-month interval between the duty-paying documents and availment of credit did not justify disallowance where the clarification resolved the applicable treatment of lubricating oil. The credit was consequently available for utilisation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>