<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 119 -  CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2189</link>
    <description>Amounts received later under a contractual bonus arrangement were treated as part of the sale consideration and included in assessable value under the transaction value concept, because Section 4 of the Central Excise Act covers sums payable by the buyer by reason of or in connection with the sale at any time. The duty demand was therefore sustained. On penalty, the dispute was viewed as one turning on interpretation of the new valuation provisions, and the penalty was set aside. The result was partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 119 -  CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2189</link>
      <description>Amounts received later under a contractual bonus arrangement were treated as part of the sale consideration and included in assessable value under the transaction value concept, because Section 4 of the Central Excise Act covers sums payable by the buyer by reason of or in connection with the sale at any time. The duty demand was therefore sustained. On penalty, the dispute was viewed as one turning on interpretation of the new valuation provisions, and the penalty was set aside. The result was partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>