<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 184 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271479</link>
    <description>Rule 57G allowed condonation where a manufacturer showed sufficient reasons for not filing the Modvat declaration in time, and a curable procedural lapse could not defeat credit otherwise admissible. The assessee was a new entrant, the department did not dispute its lack of familiarity with Modvat requirements, and the inputs for which credit was claimed had been received within the prescribed six-month period. On those facts, the delay in filing the declaration was sufficiently explained, the lapse stood cured, and denial of Modvat credit was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 184 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271479</link>
      <description>Rule 57G allowed condonation where a manufacturer showed sufficient reasons for not filing the Modvat declaration in time, and a curable procedural lapse could not defeat credit otherwise admissible. The assessee was a new entrant, the department did not dispute its lack of familiarity with Modvat requirements, and the inputs for which credit was claimed had been received within the prescribed six-month period. On those facts, the delay in filing the declaration was sufficiently explained, the lapse stood cured, and denial of Modvat credit was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>