<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 183 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271478</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the demand for wrongfully availed Cenvat credit and the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The judgment emphasized adherence to the rules in force at the time and the absence of evidence supporting intentional evasion of duty by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 183 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271478</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed both appeals, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the demand for wrongfully availed Cenvat credit and the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The judgment emphasized adherence to the rules in force at the time and the absence of evidence supporting intentional evasion of duty by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>