https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271475 The Tribunal held that no cost recovery charges could be imposed when no officer was specifically posted for such recovery. It clarified that while the recovery of supervision charges falls under Customs Act powers, the rate of recovery is an administrative decision not within CESTAT's jurisdiction. The Tribunal differentiated between CESTAT's jurisdiction concerning the recovery of charges under the Customs Act and the administrative decision on the rate of recovery, ruling that the appeal was not maintainable regarding the rate at which cost recovery was made. The impugned order was modified to reflect this distinction. en-us Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Feb 2016 15:02:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271475 The Tribunal held that no cost recovery charges could be imposed when no officer was specifically posted for such recovery. It clarified that while the recovery of supervision charges falls under Customs Act powers, the rate of recovery is an administrative decision not within CESTAT's jurisdiction. The Tribunal differentiated between CESTAT's jurisdiction concerning the recovery of charges under the Customs Act and the administrative decision on the rate of recovery, ruling that the appeal was not maintainable regarding the rate at which cost recovery was made. The impugned order was modified to reflect this distinction. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 22 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271475