<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 179 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271474</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with a predeposit order. The appellant, citing financial distress, requested to recall the final order and sought condonation of the delay. Despite exceeding the predeposit amount, the appeal was restored on the condition of paying costs. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to court orders and timely communication, balancing enforcement with opportunities for appeal in difficult circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2016 15:02:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 179 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271474</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with a predeposit order. The appellant, citing financial distress, requested to recall the final order and sought condonation of the delay. Despite exceeding the predeposit amount, the appeal was restored on the condition of paying costs. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to court orders and timely communication, balancing enforcement with opportunities for appeal in difficult circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>