https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271473 The Tribunal upheld the custom duty demand of Rs. 1,88,26,572 for the period between November 1997 to March 2005. It found that while the original notification did not include an installation requirement, subsequent amendments necessitated compliance. The appellant was required to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs within eight weeks, with the remaining liability stayed pending appeal. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal. The decision aimed to balance the appellant's interests with customs duty regulations. en-us Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Feb 2016 15:01:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271473 The Tribunal upheld the custom duty demand of Rs. 1,88,26,572 for the period between November 1997 to March 2005. It found that while the original notification did not include an installation requirement, subsequent amendments necessitated compliance. The appellant was required to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs within eight weeks, with the remaining liability stayed pending appeal. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal. The decision aimed to balance the appellant's interests with customs duty regulations. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 14 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271473