https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178461 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is limited to cases of jurisdictional error, perversity, or absence of supporting material; a finding backed by some evidence cannot be disturbed merely because another view is possible. Applying that standard, the concurrent finding that the respondent was a temporary lessee for two years was left undisturbed, and the High Court's wider interference was held impermissible. In the record-of-rights objection proceedings under Section 44 of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, the authorities were competent to determine the appellant's status, and the entry treating the appellant as a tenure holder was upheld because the challenge disclosed no jurisdictional error or perversity. en-us Wed, 28 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:08:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178461 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is limited to cases of jurisdictional error, perversity, or absence of supporting material; a finding backed by some evidence cannot be disturbed merely because another view is possible. Applying that standard, the concurrent finding that the respondent was a temporary lessee for two years was left undisturbed, and the High Court's wider interference was held impermissible. In the record-of-rights objection proceedings under Section 44 of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, the authorities were competent to determine the appellant's status, and the entry treating the appellant as a tenure holder was upheld because the challenge disclosed no jurisdictional error or perversity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178461