<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178443</link>
    <description>The court held that the Appellants qualify as Thika Tenants under both the 1949 Act and the 1981 Act. It was determined that the land in question vested in the State from 18 January 1982. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and the Tribunal&#039;s ruling confirming the Appellants&#039; Thika Tenant status and the land&#039;s vesting in the State was upheld. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1123 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178443</link>
      <description>The court held that the Appellants qualify as Thika Tenants under both the 1949 Act and the 1981 Act. It was determined that the land in question vested in the State from 18 January 1982. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and the Tribunal&#039;s ruling confirming the Appellants&#039; Thika Tenant status and the land&#039;s vesting in the State was upheld. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>