<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1702 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178445</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that additions made under Section 153A were unjustified as no incriminating material was found during the search. The Tribunal directed deletion of additions concerning gifts and the variance in construction costs, emphasizing that reassessment requires the presence of incriminating material, as established in relevant court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 06:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=415517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1702 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178445</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that additions made under Section 153A were unjustified as no incriminating material was found during the search. The Tribunal directed deletion of additions concerning gifts and the variance in construction costs, emphasizing that reassessment requires the presence of incriminating material, as established in relevant court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>